Skip to main content
Hello Lovelies!!

I was pretty sure that it was a requirement for book bloggers to hate the dichotomy of "boy" books and "girl" books that society has imposed, but I'm starting to wonder if I was wrong.

I'm sure if I did some research, I could find out exactly when and where and why (oh my god whyyyy) there became a split between books that girls could read and boys could read. Anyone with sense would think that as society became more progressive, this dichotomy would disappear, but alas that's not the case. In fact, from what I see daily, it's only gotten worse. There's Doodles For Boys (full of spaceships and dinosaurs and monsters) and Doodles for Girls (full of unicorns and princesses and fashion). There's the Dangerous Book for Boys and the Daring Book for Girls. There's Classic Stories for Girls and Classic Stories for Boys.

JUST STOP IT.

Stop enforcing gendered expectations on children! Girls can (and do!) like robots and superheroes and dinosaurs and cars and toolboxes. Boys can (and do!) like princesses and dancing and unicorns and fashion. Stop telling people what they can and can't (and will and won't) like.

Maybe by now you're saying, duh Hayley. We've got this. We don't say these things.

But just two days ago, I read a book review where that's exactly what the blogger said. I don't want to point fingers and fling accusations. But I do want people to be aware of what they're saying.

Of course, now you're thinking, but it makes sense to say that this book would appeal more to boys or to girls! But it doesn't. Perhaps it's become a little like the old chicken and egg thought process. What came first, the penchant for boys to like adventure stories or the recommendation of adventure stories for boys? Is it nature for all girls to love romance stories or are girls just repeatedly told that they'll love any romance story?

Or maybe you're thinking, well boys need to be super interested in a book to read and boys don't read as much as girls and we really need to put forth a lot of effort to get boys to read. Nope. I say noooooooooo. And as super scientific addendum to that, I'd like to direct you to this Tumblr post.  As usual, men (or in this case boys) come out ahead of women (or girls). We're so concentrated on "getting boys to read" that we pretty much refuse to acknowledge that girls can also struggle to connect to reading.

I would like to instead switch from saying "girls will love this book!" to "People who love romance and character-driven stories will love this book!" The latter has the added benefit of acknowledging people who fall outside of the girl/boy dichotomy as well. (Which is definitely a rant for another day because my god how often do we just separate between boys and girls with no other options??) I would like to focus on getting children to read: of all ages, of all genders.


So that's my rant for today. What do you guys think? Is it necessary to say boys/girls will love this book? Am I in crazy town?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Diversity in Your Book Diet

Hello Lovelies! As usual Top Ten Tuesday is brought to you by the lovely people over at The Broke and the Bookish . Today's topic is Top Ten Books for People Who Like X, and I'm going to go with... Top Ten Books for People Who Like Diversity Thanks to the efforts of groups like We Need Diverse Books, diversity is having a resurgence in young adult and children's books. For the last couple years, I have been trying to read more books with diverse characters or by diverse authors. (Diverse in this respect includes race, sexuality, gender, and disability). I haven't endeavored to challenge myself to only read a certain type of book i.e. only those by women of color or anything that isn't by a white heterosexual male, but I try to be extra aware of the characters and ask myself if they actually are white (sometimes the text doesn't say it, sometimes people just assume it!) and if being white is necessary for the character or not.  But here are my top t...
Hello Lovelies!! It's a very special Top Ten Tuesday because it's also my 100th post!! Woohoo!! Honestly this is probably the longest I've stuck with a hobby so I'm pretty excited about this milestone. So The Broke and the Bookish 's topic this week is.. I went with books that I own but haven't read yet which I would like to take to a beach (if I could get to one, hahaha, Montana is a landlocked state).  Keeping the Moon by Sarah Dessen Girl at Sea by Maureen Johnson Sloppy Firsts by Megan McCafferty Megan Meade's Guide to the McGowan Boys by Kate Brian If I Stay by Gayle Forman Statistical Probability of Love at First Sight by Jennifer E. Smith Viola in Reel Life by Adriana Trigiani Read My Lips by Teri Brown Going Too Far by Jennifer Echols The Nature of Jade by Deb Caletti So that's my list! It's heavy on contemporary fiction novels because summer brin...

TBT: The Witch of Blackbird Pond

In middle school, I was a member of this reading club where we had a set of books to read as a team, and then we did like little quizzes on them against other teams. (SUPER NERD!). And now, I'm not entirely certain, but I feel pretty sure that club was where I read this book for the first time. The Witch of Blackbird Pond by Elizabeth George Speare is a Newbery award winning historical fiction novel. Orphan Kit Tyler has been moved from her home in the Caribbean to her puritan relative's home in Connecticut.  She feels like she has nothing in common with these relatives, but she does form an attachment with an old Quaker woman and a young sailor, Nat. Of course breaking out of the mold is not without its price, and Kit learns this for herself when she is accused of witchcraft. This is one of those books that I think about constantly. I haven't reread it in several years, but I always want to. I recommend it frequently to other. This is a book for readers...